The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals

May 25, 2006 on 11:49 am | In Law and Lawyers | No Comments

Dubbed “the most often overturned” court (an untrue, but popular belief), the 9th Circuit encompasses a vast area of the country, from far-flung islands of the Pacific to Montana and Idaho. Conservatives view the 9th Circuit Court as a “liberal, activist” court – a term generally used by conservatives when a court’s opinions tend not to fall in lock-step with the conservative agenda. Conservatives would divide the court into several more circuits, in an effort to dilute what the far right sees as too much power in one Court of Appeals.

I think it is the most interesting court to follow, in terms of its writings and its opinions – the 9th Circuit does not shy away from controversy….it has, for example, tackled issues of medical marijuana and the use of “God” in schools.

The Court also wrestles with drier issues, such as the “mailbox rule” – a rule that all first-year law students learn (some to hate!). In its usual fashion, the 9th tackles such issues with flair and wit. In a recent writing (cited below), it stated:

“This case provides fresh meaning to James M. Cain’s ‘The Postman Always Rings Twice.’1 Anton Vacek was first struck by a Post Office truck, and then had his damage claim stamped out because the Post Office lost it in the mail.

1JAMES M. CAIN, THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (KNOPF, 1934); See also THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (WARNER, 1981); THE POSTMAN ALWAYS RINGS TWICE (MGM, 1946); LE DERNIER TOURNANT (LUX PRODUCTIONS, 1939). The title is ironic because there is no reference to a postman either in Cain’s book or in the subsequent film adaptations. When asked for an explanation, Cain purportedly explained that his manuscript had been rejected by 13 publishers prior to being accepted for publication on his 14th attempt, so that when the publisher asked him what he wanted the work to be entitled he drew on this experience and suggested The Postman Always Rings Twice. Like Vacek, Cain apparently had come to associate the postal service with dark disappointment.” [Vacek v. United States Postal Service, No. 04-15961 (9th Cir. May 24, 2006).]

In my very humble opinion, may the 9th Circuit keep on rolling (as currently configured) – it brings a sense of humor and style to the majority of its rulings. And it remains undaunted by those who would homogenize America in every conceivable fashion.

Uninspired — but there’s always Jon Stewart!!!

May 23, 2006 on 5:03 pm | In Law and Lawyers | No Comments

Why, do I love Jon Stewart and why do I never miss the Daily Show?

I know – who doesn’t love Jon Stewart? Pretty much everyone with a brain loves Jon — am I brain-dead? Not yet. But I feel I shouldn’t love the mighty Stewart. Reason? Got two: he makes dumb jokes about lawyers and about the law.

Why rail against dumb lawyer jokes? They’re funny, aren’t they? Most of them are, yes! Some are just dumb. Like most who are law students or those working on becoming lawyers or real lawyers, I enjoy good lawyer jokes. But, under the current administration, I’m not certain that making a joke of all lawyers is a wise choice. Some lawyers deserve as much ridicule as we can muster. However, we may need some of the good ones — to fight back against…oh, so many current and stupid policies. So, Dear Jon, please know that diluting lawyer power with ridicule isn’t necessarily a smart move right now — not against all of the lawyers, anyway.

Ok, the other reason……I bought a “Jon Stewart for President” t-shirt, and I sorta meant it — meant it until I heard him make some baseless comments about the Constitution. Then…….Well, then I thought “the man, as wise as he truly is, does not understand the basics of the very document that allows him to say whatever he wants (and Lord knows, whatever Stewart says usually needs saying!) on his show every night.” He needs some help. Tried to email him – but he’s way out of the “let me drop a line with my stupid thoughts” email league, isn’t he? Thought of snail mail, but what are the chances, really, that he’d ever see it?

Ok, so by blog? This blog? This isn’t exactly what I’d call high-profile. But what the hell — here’s my lame attempt to get a message to Jon Stewart:

Jon, dear man, to use your own words against you — and I never admired you more than when you said these words — you’re hurting America. Whenever you attack the Constitution without reason or understanding - you’re causing harm. You have to learn to appreciate what an amazing document it is, and then you can (and perhaps should) attack at the current state of the law at will.

For the sake of those who watch you — particularly for the kids, try to talk to Erwin Chemerinsky – he’s a Duke University professor. He’s a fascinating man – a Constitutional scholar for the ages. When they say he wrote the book on the Constitution – they aren’t kidding – I think he has written four of them. Check out his web page at Duke Law.

Be really brave — ask Professor Chemerinsky to come on your show – you may think that because he is considered to be one of the top legal minds in the country, he’ll be boring. He won’t be. He’s engaging and entertaining; he comes complete with a kick-ass sense of humor…..Ask any law student who has listened to one of his lectures.

Failing a chat with the Professor, pick up one of his books. Don’t let us down, Jon. While it’s certainly your right to dislike lawyers, and to lack faith in the Constitution, please do so from an informed viewpoint, else you run the risk of sounding just like Bill O’Reilly. You would hate that, wouldn’t you?

Oh wait, one more question…….If anyone actually sees this — will it cost me the tickets that I finally scored to the Daily Show?????

Uninspired

May 23, 2006 on 4:25 pm | In Law and Lawyers | No Comments

I love blogging – except when I can’t, for reasons of time or inspiration….and I’ve little time and zero inspiration today. So why bother anyone who may stumble across this blog? Well, I do have questions….

Important questions. Like why does my copy of Word want to drive me crazy? Why does it keep giving me indecipherable error messages? And why, when I try to fix it, does it always tell me to find the disc? Isn’t the program that loaded when I paid enormous bucks for it big and smart enough to fix itself? And, that age-old question, where the hell did I put the disc????

What is an RSS feed? I know, it’s Really Simple Syndication, or Real Stupid Stuff – whatever…. But how does it work? Does anyone (outside a handful of brilliant programmers) really know? And why do I care? More questions — next blog…..

Why Should I Hire An Attorney to Do What I Already Pay My Insurance Company To Do???

May 5, 2006 on 1:17 pm | In Accidents & Injury | No Comments

After the Accident

After an accident, many feel that they can deal with their own insurance company without any help from an attorney. Sometimes that is true. If your injury is due to an auto accident and the claim involves, primarily damage to your vehicle and one visit to an emergency room, it probably makes sense to settle with your insurance company.

If your accident is more serious, if you are injured and you need more than emergency room care, it make sense to speak to a personal injury attorney (make certain that the initial consultation is free of charge).

The Insurance Company
After an accident, you will hear from an insurance company about your claim. That insurer may work for your employer, or may insure a homeowner (for dog bites or injuries sustained on another’s property), or the insurer may work for an automobile insurance company. There are as many different kinds of insurance companies and types of policies as there are accidents. The insurance companies train those who contact you to be friendly and to act as if they are concerned for your well-being. They will tell you that they will help you to get the compensation you deserve, and will often tell you that hiring a lawyer will not be necessary, or may actually delay the settlement of your case. They are well-trained to make you feel good about working directly with them, without the help of an attorney.

This is the job of the insurance company. Insurance companies are in the business of making money. They make money by charging high premiums and by denying claims. They make money by failing to pay a fair amount of money for your injuries and damages. They are trained to make certain the company pays you very little for your injuries, or denies your claim completely.

Enter the Attorneys

So why do you need an attorney? No one likes attorneys – they are the bulldogs, the sharks – use any animal comparison that you like. But when you hire an attorney, that attorney is working for you. That attorney becomes your bulldog; your shark; and will fight for your rights against the insurance company.

Insurance companies are not happy when attorneys become involved; often that means the company must pay its own attorneys to fight the case, and attorneys are paid more than adjusters.

When an insured person hires an attorney, the insurance companies usually drop the “nice guy” attitude. We know this, because, at the Accidental Lawyer’s firm, we deal with insurance adjusters every day. Not all adjusters are unpleasant, but they are paid to be aggressive and intractable. Attorneys are accustomed to this; their experience and skill allows them to determine whether the adjuster is being reasonable or unreasonable and how to handle the adjuster in each situation.

Attorneys Know Your Rights

Experienced attorneys know how much time you have to file your claim. An attorney knows that the time for filing varies depending upon the type of accident, who was involved in the accident, and from state to state.

A skilled attorney knows who to sue. Often accidents involve multiple parties – each party may have some blame for the accident. For an injury which takes place at work, there may be more than just workers’ compensation benefits available to you; another party (such as a subcontractor, or delivery van) involved may also have some share of the blame for the accident.

There may be occasions when you are partially to blame for an accident. The amount of compensation or the ability to be compensated at all if you have some fault varies from state to state.

There is no simple answer in many situations. If your case is a valid one, an experienced attorney can guide you through the morass and pitfalls to a reasonable compensation for your injury.

If You Should Decide Not To Hire An Attorney

Remember, in all dealings with an insurance company, that the company is a for-profit business, and it won’t make money by paying out claims. It will only make money by collecting premiums and not paying adequate compensation when a claim is made by one of its insured.

When you speak to an insurance representative, everything you say is being noted by that representative. In fact, they will often request a recorded statement. That statement may later be used against you to deny you fair compensation. Be wary of what you sign. Read all documents that are sent to you by the insurance representative.

If you have questions, contact an attorney. If your injury occurred in California, contact the Accidental Lawyer for a free initial consultation and sound advice at 510-465-1500 or 1-800-824-4418.

Wrongful Death

May 5, 2006 on 1:05 pm | In Accidents & Injury | 1 Comment

Wrongful death is a term used when a person dies as the result of a wrongful action of another. That death can be caused by either another person or by the wrongful act of a company, city, state or federal agency. Some of the most common causes of wrongful death are vehicle accidents, plane and train crashes, construction accidents, medical malpractice and defective products.
When someone we love dies, the pain can be overwhelming. The pain can be even greater when a loved one dies due to the fault of another, because it seems as if that death could have, and should have, been prevented.

Money is a poor substitute; it is however the only remedy the law has given us to right such a wrong. Often, those who bring a wrongful death lawsuit feel they may have done good for others, as their lawsuit may cause a government agency to write new regulations or a company to change its policies in order to increase safety for others.
At such a stressful time, a personal injury attorney with experience in this area of the law is a necessity. Such an attorney can evaluate your case and tell you whether you have a right to bring a case against the one who caused the death of your loved one.
Fees

At the Accidental Lawyer’s firm, no fees are charged unless and until the firm wins your case. The fees are a reasonable percentage of the amount obtained by our firm for your loss. The firm and the client will sign an agreement about the fees and costs arrangements prior to the acceptance of the case by the firm. All terms will be explained prior to signing the retainer agreement.

Settlement or Trial?

The Accidental Lawyer and staff are experienced in both trying cases in court and in settling cases out of court. Often the trial court will order the parties involved in the lawsuit to attempt to settle the case out of court. The court will not, however, force a settlement. That decision is one for each party to make, with the advice of their attorneys.
Settlement. If a case can be settled out of court to the satisfaction of both parties, then that may be the right decision to make. The Accidental Lawyer will always present all of the available information necessary for the client to make a decision, but the decision to settle or go to trial is that of the client.
Often, those who assist in settling cases (called mediators or arbitrators) will say that the case is well-settled if both parties go away from the settlement discussion feeling as if they didn’t “win”.

Trial. Trial is what great lawyers live for – trials are the reason many become lawyers. There is nothing more interesting and exciting for a good and very experienced trial lawyer than a tough trial.

That said, a trial can be very difficult for clients. Trials are confusing and expensive, the procedures can be intimidating, and juries are unpredictable. These are some of the reasons that many clients will decide to settle prior to trial.
At the Accidental Lawyer, the attorneys are seasoned professionals who have won many cases at trial. The attorneys will advise you of the pitfalls of both settling and trying cases and allow you to determine the course your case will take.
If a wrongful death has occurred in California and you wish to speak to an attorney (even if you are not certain that the death was wrongful), please call the Accidental Lawyer at 510-465-1500 or 1-800-824-1424 for a free consultation.

What To Do After An Accident

May 5, 2006 on 1:01 pm | In Accidents & Injury | No Comments

It is always difficult to know exactly what to do after an accident.  Accidents happen so quickly and are so upsetting that most who are involved in auto accidents (including attorneys!) fail to get vital information necessary to obtain adequate compensation for thier losses – the loss of, or damage to, a vehicle; medical expenses and loss of wages for the time lost from work due to the accident. 

The following list includes suggestions that may help you if you should become involved in an accident:

  • Always keep a disposable camera in your vehicle.  Take pictures of the scene (only if it is safe to do so!) to show the positions of the vehicles before they are moved.  Take pictures of the damage one to your vehicle.  Keep these pictures after you take them.
  • Get the names, addresses and phone numbers of anyone who may have witnessed the accident.
  • Get the names, addresses, phone numbers, insurance information and driver’s license information of the other drivers involved in the accident.  Always write down the license plates of the vehicles involved in the accident (to give to the police or DMV if necessary).
  • Call the police to determine whether the department is able to respond to your accident.  Often the police will not respond to a minor fender-bender, due to a lack of resources.  If this is the case, go to the police station to make a report as soon as possible.
  • Go to a doctor – seeking medical attention immediately is often something people fail to do – either they are too busy, or feel as if they have not been injured.  It is very important that you allow yourself to be evaluated by a medical professional; that you describe all of your injuries, detailing each part of your body that hurts.
  • Understand that many injuries will not become painful right away.  Injuries to muscles and tissue often become very painful several days after the injury occurs.  It is important to follow up your initial medical visit so that the doctor can determine the extent of your injuries.
  • Call a personal injury attorney for a case evaluation.  Be certain, when you call, that the evaluation will be done at no charge.  At the Accidental Lawyer, the initial consultation is free; in fact, there is no fee unless and until we win your case.

Immigration Marches Have a Positive Effect

April 11, 2006 on 9:24 pm | In Civil Rights | No Comments

According to a CNN report, the Republican leaders of the House and Senate will drop the provision of the immigration bill they have been working to pass — the provision that makes illegal entry into the US a felony.  This is a direct effect of the peaceful, massive demonstrations held across the country during the past week.

According to a CNN news article [dated Tuesday, April 11, 2006; Posted: 9:48 p.m. EDT (01:48 GMT)] “Jennifer Crider, a spokeswoman for House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi of California, said Republicans ‘are feeling the heat’ after demonstrations that brought out hundreds of thousands of protesters in 39 states on Monday….No amount of spin can change the fact that Republicans wrote and passed the Sensenbrenner bill, which criminalizes an entire population,” Crider said. ‘The bill is beyond repair.’”

Hundreds of thousands of people found their voices during this past week.  They demonstrated the power that determined groups of people can wield when they work together to effect change.  The folks in Washington D.C. seem to forget at times, the reason they’re working there and for whom they’re working.  They remembered quickly this week.  Let’s hope that this will be a wake-up call to those who work on the Hill.  The time has come to find a way to bring all people together; not to turn decent people into felons, but to reward all who work hard to find their own piece of the American dream.

In our law office, many of clients speak Spanish.  My husband is fluent in Spanish, as is our staff.  We see clients every day who support the economy by working hard, paying taxes and taking care of their families.  Most people want the same things in life, I believe; the same simple things.  They want to earn a decent living, raise a family and make a better life for their children. 

As the granddaughter of an immigrant, it is easy for me to understand the desire to be an American.  I’m not so very far removed from being a member of the “huddled masses, yearning to breathe free”.  There are few members of our society who can claim to be native to America, and there are fewer still Native Americans who are working on Capitol Hill as members of Congress.  It’s time to stop being hypocritical; to stop trying to close the door behind us.  We should welcome those who want so much to be a part of our society that they are willing to brave walking across deserts and sailing across seas in small boats in order to get here.  That spirit is what made this country great and what keeps her strong.  We should celebrate it.

$1 Million Verdict for In-Custody Death

April 9, 2006 on 9:32 pm | In Civil Rights & Police Brutality | No Comments

In custody deaths have been rising across the nation — from shootings to excessive force (including the use of Tasers).  Taser use has been much in the news of late and is the subject of a study recently published by Amnesty International (see http://www.amnestyusa.org). 

Our first police brutality case involved excessive force.  It was, without a doubt, the most heartbreaking and fascinating cases I’ve worked on.  The case was entitled Smith v. The City of San Jose.  Our client’s husband was killed during an attempt by members of the San Jose Police Department to take him into custody.  News report excerpts stated:

Jury: S.J. owes $1 million   

By Chuck Carroll and John Woolfolk
Mercury News
“A jury has slapped San Jose with a $1 million judgment — one of the largest in the city’s history — after finding police officers were partly responsible for the 2001 death of a mentally ill man who died as he resisted arrest for a disturbance at a fast-food restaurant.
City Attorney Rick Doyle said he was shocked by the amount of damages awarded, calling Wednesday’s judgment the highest under his tenure. He said the city will ask the court for a new trial or seek a reduction in damages.”

The City was denied a new trial; it received no reduction.  Other excerpts, from the San Jose Mercury news article cited above, explained the case in broad overview:

“Police said officers were dispatched to the restaurant after customers complained about a man yelling and making racial comments and threats. When three officers arrived, they found Smith, 45, outside the restaurant at a nearby bus stop where he shouted at people passing by, police said.
They decided to take Smith into custody for observation because of his mental distress.
Police said Smith was handcuffed, but continued to kick. They placed him face down on the curb, at which point officers attempted to restrain him as they tried to place a nylon wrap around his legs. The officers noticed he had stopped breathing and called for paramedics, who were unable to revive him. The coroner determined Smith had died of asphyxiation.
Kim Smith’s attorney, Steven Jacobsen of Oakland, contended the officers ignored their training in handling Smith, who police say weighed more than 300 pounds. He said the police should have rolled Smith on his back or side to make sure he could breathe.
“This terrible tragedy raises awareness of the need for better police training in dealing with the mentally ill,'’ Jacobsen said. An arrest for mental distress “should not turn into punishment and certainly should not end up in death,'’ he said. “The victim in this case was a paranoid schizophrenic, and I believe the police believed they could do whatever they wanted to control him.'’

I wish I could tell you that my husband’s prediction that this case would raise awareness had come true; however, in-custody deaths are on the rise.  We are currently working on several new cases - all equally tragic.

Lawyers and the Media

April 7, 2006 on 8:12 pm | In Law and Lawyers | No Comments

Most lawyers believe passionately in the Constitution.  It is their touchstone.  Most lawyers spend their professional lives defending that document and all it stands for.  Now if this sounds as if I’m trying to wrap lawyers in the flag, then so be it.

Whenever a lawyer is asked how he can possibly defend a person who may have committed murder, that lawyer (if he or she is not too weary of answering that particular question) will likely explain that, under the Constitution, each of us is innocent until proven guilty – we each have a right to a vigorous defense of our freedoms that are guaranteed under the Constitution.  Those attorneys who work to prosecute criminals will tell you that they are also defending the Constitution - allowing us to live in a safe society that reflects our national values.  In my opinion, these lawyers do the down and dirty work that keeps all of us safe and free.

Personal injury lawyers believe that they represent the only line of defense between the powerful and the not-so-powerful.  They will explain that they put their own money and their reputation on the line whenever they accept a case.  They will explain that no matter how hard they work on a case — no matter how many hundreds of hours they spend defending an individual’s rights, they are only paid a portion of whatever money is paid to the client.  If a personal injury attorney loses, he gets nothing for his time and effort. 

Lawyers who work for large corporations will tell you that they are fighting to keep America’s dollars flowing freely, thus keeping our economy robust.  Their work helps to keep the U.S. in the forefront of the many thriving economies in the world.  The corporate lawyer’s work in contract law is of vital interest to our national economy.

The media, though, doesn’t always know the good lawyer from the bad, nor the truth from fiction.  All too often, the media prints whatever it is fed from the public relations offices of companies or firms.  It is difficult to separate the truth from fiction from the outside.  I know this, because I spent a great deal of my life on the outside, and now, from my current position (basically, waiting to leap over the bar that separates lawyers from the rest of the world), I can see the from both sides. 

I’m hopeful that, due to the fact that I decided to try to become a lawyer late in life, I will never lose the ability to see with some clarity — I want to be able to see the truth from both sides of the bar.  Perhaps this blog will allow me to maintain that perspective.

The Sharks

April 7, 2006 on 7:55 pm | In Law and Lawyers | No Comments

Lawyers — Friend or Foe?
Lawyers are often compared to sharks – those fish who feed ceaselessly, or die.  Interesting comparison, made even more interesting by its use both for and against lawyers.  When one of you needs a lawyer, you’ll likely the hire the toughest one you can find and brag “My lawyer is one mean SOB – a real shark!”  When one of you is dragged into court, or settlement proceedings by someone who has hired a lawyer, your friends will, no doubt, hear that “all those *%$#ed lawyers are nothing but sharks!” 

Lawyers can be the best friend you will ever have if you get into trouble – the waters of courts of law are difficult to navigate without a specialist.  Lawyers may also be the bane of your very existence if you become involved in a lawsuit.  They are, however, extremely necessary when rights are in need of protection.

Big Businesses and Their Interests
The pharmaceutical companies are, as I write, lobbying Congress to pass laws to limit their liability in lawsuits (think Vioxx).  They are following in the steps of insurance companies, which have been very successful in passing laws that limit medical malpractice suits. 

Now, in many states, no matter what a doctor does to you, the insurance company is protected.  Some of the states are currently seeking to undo the medical malpractice caps, because they’ve realized how unfair they are to patients who have been injured by a doctor or hospital — and yes, some doctors are not very skilled/caring. I have in mind a case in which a young woman’s baby died because no one cared enough that the baby had an elevated heartbeat, a sure sign of fetal distress.  They knew it and they sent her home.  It was her first child.  How does one compensate a young mother for the life of her child? 

The only true satisfaction anyone in her situation could hope to obtain is to send a message to the medical community — a message that may work to encourage hospitals to change their policies, or to provide more oversight.  The only way to send that message to that community is through a hard hit in their profit margin - it’s what businesses (and medicine is certainly a business now) understand.  But that can’t happen - the caps on recovery for medical malpractice are too low in many of our States to send the kind of message that will be understood and acted upon.

Few firms bring frivolous lawsuits because it goes against the ethical code that governs lawyers; one which almost all believe in and live by.  There is also a more practical reason — frivolous lawsuits rarely win at trial.  In the case of a personal injury suit, the lawyer typically will work on a contingency fee basis.  That lawyer generally pays for all legal costs during the case - she is reimbursed only if she wins the case and there is enough money to distribute the funds as necessary - to doctors, experts, and clients. 

Lawyers don’t like throwing money away any more than anyone else does, and it costs a LOT of money for a personal injury lawyer to bring a case to trial. I know this all sounds self-serving, and there is certainly some self-interest at work here, because the business of personal injury law – the excitement of fighting and winning compensation for an individual and against big corporations is fascinating, challenging and invigorating.  We would hate to give it up.  But lawyers will continue to practice law.  It may not be personal injury law if the big businesses finally realize their dream and take away all rights to bring suits for injuries, but lawyers will find a way to thrive. 

In the end it will be, primarily, your loss, as you find that you must accept whatever the insurance company believes you deserve for your injuries and suffering.
So who are the sharks?
Š

Next Page »